Problems With The Silencer Evidence: Was The Silencer On The Rifle?

Started by Erik Narramore, January 28, 2022, 09:00:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Erik Narramore

The rifle could not easily fit into the gun cupboard with the silencer attached to it. 

The gun cupboard ordinarily had lots of stuff in it: boxes, ammunition, other guns, and what not.  The rifle would not be naturally positioned like it is in the photograph that DC Hammersley took in November 1985.  It is a contrived photograph taken by the police to prove a point because Jeremy had averred that he would have taken off the silencer when stowing away the rifle.  Surely we can concede that Jeremy at least has a point in this regard?

I am not saying that Anthony Pargeter lied in his statement.  I think it is more likely that he has misremembered what he examined on the 26th. July when giving his statement to police in August.  It's an easy mistake to make.  In any event, to be clear, I am doubtful that Anthony Pargeter ever saw a silencer on that rifle.

I accept that even if Anthony Pargeter never saw the silencer, Jeremy could still have been concerned that the silencer would be missed.  But if Jeremy had the presence of mind to realise that Sheila could not reach the trigger of the silenced rifle (actually, she could, but that's perhaps beside the point), wouldn't he also have had the presence of mind not to allow family members to have the key to the farmhouse with the silencer still there?  Wouldn't he have arranged disposal of the weapons himself?

Furthermore, if Jeremy disposed of the silencer in the gun cupboard while carrying out the crime, why was no blood found on the den carpet or in the gun cupboard, other than on the silencer itself?

This is before we get into the whole question of whether the silencer was used at all.  After the 2011/12 CCRC rejection, new expert ballistic evidence was obtained that suggests a silencer was not used in the killings.  I also wonder how Fletcher's pull-through test could reveal no blood in the rifle barrel if the silencer was supposedly used to fire contact shots before Sheila was killed?  Simple gravity would dictate that there should be blood in the rifle barrel.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams