The Possibilities

Started by Erik Narramore, January 30, 2022, 02:11:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Erik Narramore

January 30, 2022, 02:11:02 AM
The innocent camp have to ask themselves why a trainee teacher would jeopardise everything just to exact revenge.  Yet, as explained before, people do behave in irrational ways.

I believe these are the possibilities:

(i). Julie is telling the truth and Jeremy is guilty.
(ii). Julie is telling the truth but Jeremy is innocent.
(iii). Julie is lying because she was Jeremy's 'constructive accomplice'.
(iv). Julie is lying and Jeremy is innocent.
(v). Julie is lying but Jeremy is guilty anyway.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions