A Sheila Scenario

Started by Erik Narramore, January 29, 2022, 05:04:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Erik Narramore

In my view, and after due consideration of the available facts and evidence, the only plausible and internally consistent Sheila scenario - in outline - is the following:

1. Sheila is schizophrenic.  Schizophrenics wander around at night.  Sheila can't sleep and wanders round the house.  She is upset and fearful (or angstful) as she considers the kitchen conversation earlier.

2. Nevill finds Sheila in the kitchen.  Sheila has the weapon.  It is loaded.

3. Nevill is trying to reason with Sheila, and rings Jeremy as a way of stalling her or persuading her to stop.  "If you don't stop, I'll ring Jeremy....Right, I'm calling Jeremy now...", etc.  That type of thing.

4. As Jeremy answers the phone, Sheila runs out of the kitchen and makes for the stairs.

5. Nevill terminates the call and goes after her.

6. Sheila fires on Nevill from the stairs, injuring him badly.  This is consistent with the blood evidence and the distribution of the spent cartridges on the landing.  She is advancing on him.  He turns and conspicuously makes for the kitchen, in an attempt to draw her away from the rest of the family upstairs.

7. Nevill and Sheila are now struggling in the kitchen, or Sheila just hits Nevill with the butt of the rifle, or whatever.  (Note: it is possible that the phone call to Jeremy happened at this point, just before Sheila reaches the kitchen, rather than earlier, but that would require that a police officer wipes the kitchen phone).

8. Nevill is unconscious.  I suspect he didn't die for some time and may have been alive and in and out of consciousness when Sheila killed herself later.  This is due to the accumulation of blood.

9. Sheila returns upstairs without reloading and shoots June.  She may have heard June shouting on the landing, etc.  Lookout's theory that June was first shot on the stairs may well be correct, as there needs to be a reason for a confrontation between Sheila and June, otherwise why wouldn't Sheila just go straight to the twins, then kill herself?

10. Sheila shoots June, initially only injuring her.  Sheila realises she out of ammunition.  She returns downstairs.  June is now crawling round the master bedroom towards the link door to the twins' room.

11. Sheila reloads the rifle and returns upstairs.  This time she shoots the twins, then shoots June, or maybe the order was June first, then the twins.  There may be at least one further fusillade if she has to re-load, depending on whether she could re-load the magazine fully.

12. Sheila then washes or cleans herself, and wipes the rifle action, then deliberately shoots herself.  She has a flash of clarity, and is ashamed of what she has done, therefore she doesn't commit this act in the twins' room but assumes she faces a long prison sentence and public opprobrium, etc., and thinks suicide is now her only way out.  She cries.  She knows her body will be found - obviously - and looking clean is important to her.

13. I have no idea if the movement at the window was Sheila.  The starting point with that would be astronomical charts to ascertain if moon light is a plausible explanation.  It doesn't necessarily matter to this scenario if Sheila was alive at a later point or not, was seen in the kitchen by the Raid Group, or even cut into an emergency phone line.  The ending is the same in either event.

I posted more detailed Sheila scenarios in the past, but that will do as an outline.  Obviously there will be questions and issues with it.  I don't say this is perfect.  I also don't presume to say I know what happened, but I do say that this is roughly (allowing for variations) the only plausible way it could have happened if Jeremy is innocent.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams

Erik Narramore

I'm not saying there is a problem with the call to Jeremy; I'm merely explaining how - as I see it - the scenario must work.  Nevill would not just let Sheila run off while he rings Jeremy.  Instead, Sheila would have to be present and Nevill then terminates the call only when she runs off.  I honestly don't see how it could work any other way if Jeremy is innocent.  Nevill would not let Sheila run around the house with a loaded gun, nor would he assume that the gun is unloaded.  He is a former RAF pilot and would have sufficient sense to realise the danger of any gun, loaded or presumed not loaded.

A key rule around guns is that you always assume they is loaded.  You never ever rely on a belief that a gun is unloaded.  People have been killed that way.  I have been around guns and even if I knew a gun were unloaded, I would always assume that it is still loaded and never let somebody point it at somebody else.  Note also that even if the magazine was not in the rifle at this point, it could still have had a cartridge in the breach.

I don't pretend my scenario is free of problems.  A basic problem with my scenario is that you have to wonder why Nevill didn't tackle Sheila for the gun and take it off her.  It must be that he either did and was injured and then resorted to the phone, or he tried to and couldn't catch her and in the end resorted to stalling her by telephoning Jeremy.  The latter seems the more plausible of the two.  I certainly wouldn't assume that just because she was female, short and slight, that this means Nevill could tackle her easily.  That definitely cannot be assumed.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams