Moving The Phones

Started by Erik Narramore, January 29, 2022, 01:04:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Erik Narramore

We don't know that Jeremy did remove the phone from the master bedroom.  Again, that is not a true fact.  This was started by a prominent miscarriage of justice campaigner, who used it as a reason to doubt Jeremy, but in a previous thread I outlined why I think the theory is flawed.  Briefly, it's based on a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.  Jeremy had no reason to move the phone in the first place.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams