Like it or not, we must acknowledge that one of Jeremy's previous legal representatives tampered with images in a misguided effort to bolster Jeremy's case. How do we know this or that image is reliable? The crucial question for me is the provenance of the images. Where is the source image? Can we see it? Who captured the image? Has the image been doctored or tampered with or is it a faithful reproduction of the original (to the extent reproduction techniques allow)?
Inevitably, there will have been some innocent functional refinement of the image as a consequence of digital reproduction. Have changes been logged? Or maybe they are apparent from a simple naked eye comparison.
Another question I have about this is how do we know the blood didn't get there after the body was checked by the police? We know they moved that hand.