The di Stefano frauds

Started by Erik Narramore, January 31, 2022, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Erik Narramore

January 31, 2022, 04:41:28 AM
Like it or not, we must acknowledge that one of Jeremy's previous legal representatives tampered with images in a misguided effort to bolster Jeremy's case.  How do we know this or that image is reliable?  The crucial question for me is the provenance of the images.  Where is the source image?  Can we see it?  Who captured the image?  Has the image been doctored or tampered with or is it a faithful reproduction of the original (to the extent reproduction techniques allow)?

Inevitably, there will have been some innocent functional refinement of the image as a consequence of digital reproduction.  Have changes been logged?  Or maybe they are apparent from a simple naked eye comparison.

Another question I have about this is how do we know the blood didn't get there after the body was checked by the police?  We know they moved that hand.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions