Blood Drops on the Main Stairs

Started by Erik Narramore, November 12, 2022, 03:20:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Erik Narramore

DCI Jones recorded in his pocketbook that he observed spots of blood on the stairs, but this blood was never tested to establish that it was indeed blood or of what group/type.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams

Erik Narramore

I agree most likely Nevill's, but we don't exactly know where on the stairs the blood was observed.  I appreciate DCI Jones will have been experienced in observing blood stains, but unless it was tested, we can't be sure it was blood or whose it was.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams

Erik Narramore

I don't accept it is conclusive that June was actually shot in bed.  I understand completely why most have come to that conclusion, but I think it is possible she wasn't and the blood on the bedclothes and the bullet hole can be explained differently.

The reality is:

We don't know where on the stairs the blood was found.

We can't be certain it was blood.

If we assume it was blood, we don't know what blood type.

June need not have just been in the bedroom, though I accept she was found there and she must have been shot while in the bedroom.

I am just mooting the possibility that the blood on the stairs could be someone else's.
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams