Sheila was uncoordinated

[Erik Narramore]

How does the fact she was able to do her nails and hair, etc., square with the rest of what the prosecution say about her?  Her lack of co-ordination and so forth.  Did someone else do her nails, perhaps at a nail bar in Tiptree do you think?  Or do the prosecution acknowledge that if she did them herself, then she was not as lacking in motor co-ordination as is sometimes claimed?

Also, I assume the prosecution would say she was found clean (save for the spattered blood).  How and why did she clean herself, if she carried on like a dishevelled person?

[Erik Narramore]

I'm told the prosecution case doesn't depend on Sheila being docile, so why engage in all this elaborate guesswork about circumstances you were not witness to?  She did this, she could have done that, Jeremy did this, Jeremy believed that, Sheila never did this.  How do pro-guilt people know all this?  Were they there?

The pro-guilt side don't know when Sheila did her nails or that she was sedated or docile.  Neither do I.  I merely ask how it can be that she could do her nails at all, ever, if she lacked basic motor co-ordination.  Did she just take her time?  Some guilters says she was dishevelled by habit.  Then why was she found clean?  Did she get herself ready specially for Jeremy, knowing he was coming?

Dogmatic pro-guilt people need to get yourselves in a gridiron huddle and sort their story out.  They eem to be in a bit of muddle at the moment, changing what they say depending on the objections raised.

[Erik Narramore]

Much of what the prosecution side say is based on an assumption that Sheila was mechanically hopeless, which they treat as crucial to their whole position - which seems to me an ill-advised stance, as Sheila clearly wasn't hopeless in the sense they say.