Julie Mugford & the Safety of the Prosecution Case: a central question

Started by Erik Narramore, January 29, 2022, 02:32:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Erik Narramore

January 29, 2022, 02:32:14 AM
It's clear that the two main planks of the case are Julie Mugford's evidence and the blood in the silencer - this is officially admitted.

That being so, I would ask the guilt camp this question:

If the silencer evidence is overturned, should be conviction stand on Julie Mugford's evidence alone?
"If the accusation is not proved beyond reasonable doubt against the man accused in the dock, then by law he is entitled to be acquitted, because that is the way our rules work.  It is no concession to give him the benefit of the doubt. He is entitled by law to a verdict of Not Guilty." - R v Adams
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions